salcristina:

homoqueerjewhobbit:

Me taking my hypothetical children to pride:

See that man in the dog mask? He’s playing a game of make believe with his friends to have fun, just like we do! See how his tail is wagging?

See that man with a gun? He’s part of a violent institution that serves the ruling elite and upholds white supremacy. Fifty years ago he would have been raiding all these bars and arresting us all. He could shoot you in the face right now and probably not even lose his job. If he tries to talk to you, remember to say, “I won’t speak with you unless I have an attorney present.”

 noodlenoodlenoodlenoodle:

do you like furbies

yeah :]

dddissociation:

thatoneweirdhumanisback:

Can you reblog this if you’re pro-endogenic?

We normally wouldn’t care too much but we’ve been incredibly anxious lately trying to interact with blogs because if it doesn’t explicitly say so we will have no clue if we can interact with the blog or not.

Friends and mutuals we know irl or have known irl to a degree are absolutely fine and wk you’re good but like, you all get the idea.

Unapologetically endogenic safe. Always. 💖

06/24/23 11:00 ~ P.M.

dddissociation:

lgbtqa-pride-icons:

please reblog this post if your blog is mspec lesbian and mspec gay friendly!

lesbian man (lesboy) and vincian woman (vinciagirl) friendly aswell!

06/25/23 ~ 12:29 P.M.

hadeantaiga:

wolfgirlsvaginadentata:

hadeantaiga:

wolfgirlsvaginadentata:

angel-lepus:

hadeantaiga:

the-one-true-joshgold:

hadeantaiga:

korradfem:

hadeantaiga:

A hatred of men is an essential part of transphobia against both trans women and trans men.

Genuinely curious how you would explain the transphobia of the far right with this logic.

Does Matt Walsh hate men?

Yes.

He hates men who do not conform to the patriarchy’s ideals of manhood. He hates gay men. He hates men of color. He hates fat men. He hates men who are too thin. He hates short men. He hates Jewish men. He hates disabled men. He hates poor men.

He hates any man who does not conform to white American Christian cishet patriarchy.

And a hatred of men is not the only part of transphobia. You’ll notice I said it is a part of transphobia. Misogyny - a hatred of women - is also a part of transphobia.

I wish people could just not hate

Me too.

Misandry posting is so frustrating because yes, in fact, the fat/trans/black/etc part of it is what the far right hates. Matt Walsh or whoever else doesnt hate a cishet white male, that is his ideal. Saying that misandry effects trans women is both somewhat offensive and also ignores the whole premise of transmisogyny: any far right person does not see a trans woman as either a man or a woman. They see them as subhuman. That’s it.

Yeah, mosta that crap is linked misogyny if you have to gender it: re: fat people. Misandry is simply not a societal force worth considering and does not at all factor into these chud’s logic

I recommend both of you look through the comments on this post as well as this post and rethink what you’ve said here.

I’d like to note that I never said misandry was a form of societal oppression identical to misogyny; all I said is that it exists and it matters as an aspect of transphobia. In the USA, systemic misandry does not exist; our society is not structured to oppress all men no matter what. And I never said it was. But that doesn’t mean misandry isn’t a part of the patriarchy; it is, and it’s an important facet.

Black men are not just hated because they’re black; the fact that they are black MEN is incredibly important with regards to the type of hatred they face. Asian men aren’t just hated because they’re Asian, they type of stereotypes they have to fight against are inextricably linked to the fact that they are MEN.

To ignore the role of gender in oppression is to ignore part of how it works.

Trans people face abuse not just because we’re changing our gender and/or sex, we face abuse specifically because of our simultaneous proximity to manhood and womanhood.

To ignore the role of maleness/manhood in this is ignoring the source of the abuse, which means you’ll never actually get rid of the abuse.

And it’s not offensive to say bigots think trans women are men. Pointing out what bigots believe does not mean I personally believe it too.

I do not think trans women are men. But bigots do. And it’s important to point this out, because it matters. We can’t stop it if we deny it is happening.

DO you think transmisogyny was just coined so as to not hurt transfems’ feelings? Ever consider mayhaps why genderfuckery is considered wrong societally, surely couldn’t couldn’t be related to power structures relating to coercively assigned gender.

In addition, while fear of men does exist, it’s a tool and feature of patriarchy, a method of control, and definitely not the root cause of black/latino mens’ oppression, it’s a modifier, but in truth all black/latino people are seen as more aggressive and threatening by default, the root cause there is antiblack racism modified by misogynistic patriarchal power structures and systems of control. Also fat, short, and asian men are hated because they’re seen as not being fully masculine, alongside gay men.

Actually, while I’m still here…. let’s tackle the OG argument: transfems aren’t considered men or women by bigots, we’re considered less, the worst of both as is suits them. And transmascs aren’t even considered men at all. The issue with transness is gender power dynamics, ‘women’ shouldn’t seek to rise above their station, and 'men’ shouldn’t see anything good in the 'lesser’ gender.

Transmisandry / transandrophobia / anti-transmasculinity -

The coining of these terms had nothing to do with trans women.

These terms were coined by trans men because we lacked the language to describe our oppression. Period. That’s it. We didn’t have a word, and we needed a word, so we created a word.

That’s it.

“In addition” - yes, you’re right. A fear of men is absolutely 100% a tool of the patriarchy. I’ve actually talked extensively on this issue in other posts, including how it intersects with race. But again, the fact that they are men is core to how they are viewed and hated and you cannot dissect away their manhood out of convenience.

“OG argument” - I think multiple things can be true. Sometimes we as trans people are viewed as men, sometimes as women, and sometimes as a subhuman “other”. It depends on what the bigot needs in that moment to hurt us the most.

We are viewed as men when it is convenient to bigots to frame us as frightening and violent. We are treated and feared as men when it allows the bigots to be afraid of us, when it allows them to rally fear of us in others; when they can cry “think about the poor little girls in the bathrooms, think of the poor little girls playing sports! Testosterone is an evil hormone that makes you ugly and violent! It makes you rape people! It’s why males are inherently violent! You just want to oppress women!”.

It is convenient for them to view us as women when they want to frame us as weak idiots who are unable to think for ourselves. “They’re all too stupid to know what they want and are being misled by the beauty industry! Trans men just want to escape the patriarchy! Trans men only feel "dysphoria” because skinny is the beauty standard! Trans women just want to uphold patriarchal standards of womahood and beauty! They’re all supporting the plastic surgery industry which is exploiting them and they’re too stupid to realize it!“

And yeah, a lot of the time this means they treat us as inhuman "nonpeople” with all the bad traits of both genders. We are both so stupid we don’t know basic biology, and simultaneously so clever we can “trick the youth”, for example.

Multiple things can be true at once. But one thing that is absolutely true is that a hatred and fear of the extreme forms of maleness and manhood are inherently a part of how bigots treat us. And you seem to agree with that.

And that’s all I’m saying.

 Anonymous:

Hello i just saw the bowl of skagenröra thank yiu i now have a question an it is if skagen would sit on top of bwol?

corpsoir:

what if…. skagen on my knäckebröd with homemade skagenröra and cucumber i made yesterday……

genderkoolaid:

Transandrophobia: A F.A.Q

Keep reading

petscop:

nobody seems to understand this, so. about tagging unreality.

i know it’s all in good faith, but people really don’t understand what unreality is. i try to clarify as much as i can what i mean when i say i post untagged unreality, as this is a psychological horror based blog run by a person who finds unreality comforting.

when something calls into question someone’s perception of reality or reality itself, or if false information is given with the intent of inducing paranoia, that is unreality and/or paranoia inducing unreality.

when something states false information with humorous intent but does not call perception of reality, reality, or anyone’s being into question, that is misinformation.

#unreality warnings benefit those who experience derealization, dissociation, and other types of psychotic symptoms.

#paranoia inducing warnings benefits the same people, but more specifically protects those who are prone to paranoid spirals and delusions.

#misinfo benefits people who cannot tell if a statement is a joke and can become distressed by that fact. this can lead to the same things that untagged unreality can.

mistagging unreality can have the opposite effect, or risk watering down the reason for these tws. you can tag all three together, or if you’re unsure what tag to use, combining unreality and misinfo is a safe bet!

overall, if you don’t have a psychotic disorder, it’s really important to understand why each tag exists and what they mean. IT IS NOT A MISTAKE OR WRONG TO USE UNREALITY AS A BLANKET TAG. this post is to try and make sure people who do not experience psychosis understand why they have to tag things, and what situations prompt what tag.

that’s all from me. lov and peas on planet eart ok? hvae a bnuuy gif

 fren-in-your-computr:

Hi hi hi hi :3

bwahhh hi ! im alive, hello, how ARE you

shadythetortie:

sergeant-angels-trashcan:

404-son-of-a-shepherd-not-found:

keyhollow:

lirisa:

vampiregirl2345:

Vegans of tumblr, listen up. Harvesting agave in the quantities required so you dont have to eat honey is killing mexican long-nosed bats. They feed off the nectar and pollinate the plants. They need the agave. You want to help the environment? Go back to honey. Your liver and thyroid will thank you, as well. Agave is 90% fructose, which can cause a host of issues. Bye.

So let me get this straight ,vegans should stop eating the food of the Mexcian long-nosed bats, because the bats need it, and instead vegans should instead eat honey, the food of bees, that their larvae need, even though the bee populations are facing ecological issues as it stands. 

10/10 post, dude.

Did you forget the whole part where only excess is taken and all their needs are met and then some orrrr?

Like, did you read it orrrrr?

Anyway, BUY HONEY SAVE BEES

It is a 10/10 post. Because OP is right.

Bees do not suffer when beekeepers take their honey, because experienced beekeepers do not take all of their honey, in fact, they leave plenty of honey left for the bees to consume over the winter. If we do not collect their honey, 1 of two things will happen.

1. they will leave for a bigger home. Which at first seems fine until you remember that bees are dying very quickly out in the wild.

or

2. They will start using the areas that they reserve for their young as a place to make more honey. This is bad because if no more young are being produced, then the hive will start to die out because no new workers are coming into the world, and the average live only 150 days, so it would also mean the loss of more bees.

So yeah, eating honey isn’t inhumane at all. In fact, you’re helping the bees by eating what they produce and giving money to the bee keepers who are the ones making sure that the hive will keep being healthy.

LOUDER FOR THE VEGANS IN THE BACK: use honey, not agave! Bees need your support and other animals need agave! Using honey means more bees!!

Other animal products that are absolutely fine to use because they produce it in excess:

- Wool. Sheep need to be sheared or their wool will get excessively large, matted and gross. Its legit just a haircut. Calm down and use wool instead of whatever fake acrylic microplastic shit they have in stores now. Wool is super warm, insulating, and guess what! It grows back! Its a renewable resource and all the sheep want in return is some good pasture and protection from predators.

- Eggs. I’m not talking about storebought eggs. Go to your local farmer’s market. Find someone around with chickens/ducks. These birds produce eggs literally every day and will not stop unless they are molting, brooding, or kept in the dark for most of the day. Like I am not joking when I say you can very easily find someone with poultry and they will beg you to take some eggs. Theres so many. Please. Take some duck eggs. I dont want them. I had 8 laying ducks last year. Thats 8 eggs every day. Thats 2 dozen eggs every THREE DAYS. Thats SO MANY EGGS PLEASE TAKE SOME EGGS

Reducing animal cruelty does not mean abolish the use of animal products. Go eat honey. Go use wool. Go find a friend with birds and eat eggs, or get your own. Just because it comes from an animal does not make it cruel.

hauntedselves:

people with Histrionic PD, which symptom affects you the most?

Feeling uncomfortable w/o attention

Inappropriate sexual behaviour

Mood swings

Using appearance to get attention

Speech mimics others’, lacks detail

Dramatic

Suggestible / gullible

Overestimates intimacy

Something else

See Results

Examples: inappropriate sexual behaviour leads to criminal charges; using appearance to get attention leads to overspending; suggestibility leads to falling easily for scams or cults, etc.

Examples and explanation of symptoms from the DSM-5-TR:

Keep reading

apas-95:

rabbitrah:

I know y'all should all know by now, but here is a current example of how drag bans actually ban trans people from existing in public spaces

This was the email that was sent to Adria Jawort, a two spirit author scheduled to speak at a Montana library, on the first day of pride month.

good-jewish-omens:

good-jewish-omens:

Anyways remember that time that JK Rowling, who has never spoken to an indigenous American person in her whole life, was like “but what if the Natives had four schools and they were also bloodthirsty savages who started the residential schools with their fictional beings as their mascots and Christians weren’t actually at fault” right at the time when we started getting some traction around getting recognition for the heinous crimes that were the mass graves of children, then went on to make a whole spin-off franchise in America using that “”“lore”“” and rhetoric, where the one wizard guy who tried to stop the Holocaust from happening was villainized and played by Johnny Depp (who played Tonto in the Lone Ranger and said he was going to buy the Black Hills and Wounded Knee and “give it back to Lakota people” then never did that at all) and who she later defended as saying he wasn’t a domestic abuser because she believed him over a woman who has since been proven to be telling the truth several times over?

The woman’s a violent colonizer.

Hello <3 I deleted this original post but in light of the fact that there’s a Twilight TV series reboot/spinoff in the making let’s talk about how these women are one and the same in their actions against indigenous American people!

Stephenie Meyer is a Mormon with Mormon views. Mormons have extremely racist ideology embedded within their religious texts about indigenous Americans and Jews - that indigenous people are quite literally the Actual Real Jews (I’m mixed, this is truly insane cult rhetoric). Through the decades the LDS church has successfully funded, advocated, and carried out forced conversion and cultural genocide. THEY ARE THE ONES ACTIVELY TRYING TO OVERTURN ICWA, THE INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT.

Her views on this are very, very clearly written into the pages of her books, here’s clearer documentation about how she fucked over the Quileutes tribe and the inner workings of white supremacy in the book.

Are you seeing the pattern here? Are you seeing the undercurrent of antisemitism and anti-indigenous racist imperialism?

Get rid of your attachment to these franchises, stop making it a question of what media you will replace it with, get involved with US. We want your allyship and understanding more than these white supremacists even want to think about your humanhood.

 Anonymous:

Okay hear me out, Squid Sisters and Submas Twins interacting with each other :)!

lulucinnabon:

THEY’RE STAYING FRESH AND FOLLOWING SAFETY PROCEDURES!!!